Realm by Rook
AI product engineeringProduct designAI implementationWorkflow automationSystems integrationDomain strategyAI product engineeringProduct designAI implementationWorkflow automationSystems integrationDomain strategy
Developer & Technical Tools

Token Counter

Count tokens across GPT-5, Claude 4, Gemini 2.5, Llama 4 with live cost estimation

384 characters62 words
Used to calculate total cost per call.
Estimates are based on public tokenizer characteristics (~3.6–4.0 chars / token for English). Expect ±3% vs. official tokenizers. For exact GPT counts use OpenAI's tokenizer; for Claude use Anthropic's token-count API.
ModelInput tokensInput $Output $Total $Context fit
GPT-5
OpenAI · 272,000 ctx
96$0.000120$0.005000$0.005120✓ fits (0.2%)
GPT-5 mini
OpenAI · 272,000 ctx
96$0.000024$0.001000$0.001024✓ fits (0.2%)
GPT-5 nano
OpenAI · 272,000 ctx
96$0.000005$0.000200$0.000205✓ fits (0.2%)
GPT-4.1
OpenAI · 1,047,576 ctx
96$0.000192$0.004000$0.004192✓ fits (0.1%)
o3 (reasoning)
OpenAI · 200,000 ctx
96$0.000192$0.004000$0.004192✓ fits (0.3%)
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic · 1,000,000 ctx
101$0.001515$0.037500$0.039015✓ fits (0.1%)
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic · 1,000,000 ctx
101$0.000303$0.007500$0.007803✓ fits (0.1%)
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic · 200,000 ctx
101$0.000101$0.002500$0.002601✓ fits (0.3%)
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google · 2,097,152 ctx
107$0.000134$0.005000$0.005134✓ fits (0.0%)
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google · 1,048,576 ctx
107$0.000032$0.001250$0.001282✓ fits (0.1%)
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Google · 1,000,000 ctx
107$0.000011$0.000200$0.000211✓ fits (0.1%)
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta · 10,000,000 ctx
98$0.000026$0.000425$0.000451✓ fits (0.0%)
Llama 4 Scout
Meta · 10,000,000 ctx
98$0.000011$0.000170$0.000181✓ fits (0.0%)
DeepSeek V3.1
DeepSeek · 128,000 ctx
98$0.000026$0.000550$0.000576✓ fits (0.5%)
DeepSeek R1 (reasoning)
DeepSeek · 64,000 ctx
98$0.000054$0.001095$0.001149✓ fits (0.9%)
Mistral Large 2
Mistral · 128,000 ctx
120$0.000240$0.003000$0.003240✓ fits (0.5%)
Mistral Medium 3
Mistral · 128,000 ctx
120$0.000048$0.001000$0.001048✓ fits (0.5%)
Grok 4
xAI · 256,000 ctx
96$0.000288$0.007500$0.007788✓ fits (0.2%)

How to use

  1. Paste your prompt text
  2. Set expected completion length
  3. Review per-model tokens + cost + fit

Use cases

  • LLM cost estimation
  • Prompt engineering
  • Context-window budgeting

About the Token Counter

Every call to an LLM API bills per token — the atomic unit each model breaks your text into. Knowing the token count before you call is essential for cost forecasting, context-window budgeting, and avoiding mid-response cutoffs. This tool estimates tokens across every frontier model's tokenizer and multiplies by current API prices so you can compare apples to apples.

Features

  • Estimates for 17+ frontier models across 7 tokenizers
  • Per-model $ cost for input + configurable output length
  • Context-window fit indicator with utilization %
  • Handles Unicode + CJK with model-aware factors
  • Live per-keystroke updates

How it works

  1. Paste or type your prompt text.
  2. Set expected completion length (for total-cost estimation).
  3. Review per-model input tokens, per-call cost, and context-window fit.

Frequently asked questions

Is this exact?

+

Estimates are calibrated from publicly reported tokenizer characteristics (~3.6–4.0 chars/token English). English text is typically ±3% vs. official tokenizers. For exact GPT counts use OpenAI's tokenizer; for Claude use Anthropic's token-count API.

Why does the same text give different counts across models?

+

Each model family ships with its own tokenizer (GPT uses tiktoken, Claude uses its own ~100k vocab, Gemini uses SentencePiece). More specialized tokenizers ≠ fewer tokens — it depends on how well the vocab matches your text.

How do I lower my token count?

+

Remove redundant whitespace, use concise phrasing, put long static context behind prompt-caching, and prefer models with larger English-optimized vocabularies (Claude, GPT-4o) for long English prose.

Which model is cheapest per million tokens?

+

Varies by workload — see our LLM Price Comparison tool. As of April 2026: Llama 4 Scout, Gemini Flash-Lite, and GPT-5 nano are the budget leaders.

Does the count include my system prompt?

+

Yes — paste everything you'll send (system + user + any prior assistant turns) to get a realistic estimate.