Realm by Rook
AI product engineeringProduct designAI implementationWorkflow automationSystems integrationDomain strategyAI product engineeringProduct designAI implementationWorkflow automationSystems integrationDomain strategy
Developer & Technical Tools

HTTP Status Code Reference

Every HTTP status code — 1xx to 5xx — with RFC 9110 citations and real-world examples

Showing 54 of 54 codes · Sourced from RFC 9110 & IANA
1xx Informational
2xx Success
3xx Redirection
4xx Client Error
5xx Server Error

How to use

  1. Search by code or name
  2. Filter by category
  3. Read descriptions and RFC citations

Use cases

  • API design
  • Error handling
  • Debugging

About the HTTP Status Code Reference

Every network engineer and backend developer needs an HTTP status code cheat sheet. This one goes beyond the basics — each code includes its RFC, a plain-English description, and real-world usage examples where the semantics are subtle (401 vs 403, 301 vs 308, 422 vs 400). Full-text search catches what you don't know the number for.

Features

  • 40+ status codes from RFC 9110 and extensions (RFC 6585, 7538, 7725, 8297, 4918)
  • Category filter (1xx / 2xx / 3xx / 4xx / 5xx)
  • Full-text search over code, name, description, examples
  • Real-world usage examples for non-obvious codes
  • Color-coded by category

How it works

  1. Search by code, name, or description.
  2. Filter by status class.
  3. Click through to read descriptions, RFC citations, and examples.

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between 401 and 403?

+

401 = you're not authenticated (or your credentials are wrong). 403 = you ARE authenticated, but this resource isn't for you. 'Unauthorized' is a misnomer — the original spec meant 'Unauthenticated'.

When should I use 422 vs 400?

+

400 = request syntax broken (malformed JSON). 422 = syntax OK, semantics wrong (missing required field, invalid email format). 422 is less universally understood — use 400 if the distinction isn't critical.

Is 418 I'm a teapot a real status code?

+

Yes, registered in RFC 2324 as an April Fools joke. Kept for nostalgia. Don't use in production.

When should I return 301 vs 302 vs 307 vs 308?

+

301 = permanent (browsers + Google update bookmarks/rankings). 302 = temporary (don't update). 307 / 308 are the HTTP-method-preserving variants; 307 for temporary, 308 for permanent.

What's the right code for rate limiting?

+

429 Too Many Requests (RFC 6585). Always include a Retry-After header so clients know when to retry.